
I watched the gay debate last night, sponsored by HRC and Logo, Funny how there was an HRC-sponsored presidential debate on C-Span 4 years ago, yet last night's was "historic" and the "first ever." Maybe it was historic because it was the first with gay celebrities in the audience. That Neal Patrick Harris sure is cute. Love Jane Lynch. Of course it was a debate in name only since the candidates appeared by themselves. I'll call it the gay interview forum.
In any case, it was a fascinating two hours.
Joe.My.God and
Pam's House Blend, among others, have great re-caps, but I'd like to share my thoughts, too.
My pick for the winner (and there always has to be a clear cut winner, it seems) is Dennis Kucinich. He totally rocks. And I never say something "rocks." But Dennis does. I know, I know, he's kind of hippy-dippy, feel-the-love, but I think that's great. He's the only candidate who wants to share his love with us!
Kucinich is completely on board with gay equality without compromise, and he gets why our issues are important to America. I really believe that he is a very mainstream candidate who's been unfairly branded as an extreme left liberal. He looked good, he sounded good, he was an inspiration.
None of the other candidates could explain why they claim to support full equality for gay Americans, but don't support marriage. They can't explain it because it's indefensible. It's a purely politically expedient position and they know it, so all they can do is evade, and we saw some world-class evasion last night.
First up was Obama. I generally like Obama, but he got defensive ("Oh come on" when Jonathan Capeheart accurately called his position on marriage "old school"), he never answered questions about marriage, and he seemed a bit rattled by it all. Not his most presidential moment.
Edwards looked good, as always. How does he keep that stomach so flat? How does he have so much hair at 54? But, while he's the winner in the looks department, he just seems insincere and overly-polished. I'm glad he finally dropped that I'm-against-gay-marriage-because-I'm-Baptist bullshit, but then why can't he support full marriage equality? Because of politics, but he can't say that, so more evasive tactics. I'm not impressed.
Kucinich came next and was like a breath of fresh air. Love him. Have we actually found an honest politician? He and that hot wife of his would be a blast as first couple.
Then came Gravel, and he also supports full marriage equality, ENDA, hate crimes legislation, the whole package. What a guy. He's kind of a crazy old coot, and rambled on about nuclear warheads or something, and talked a lot about his time in the Alaska legislature which must have been when Eisenhower was president, but I bet he'd be a fun guy to have a beer with.
Richardson was on next, and he was what my mother would call a grand and glorious mess. Did he really mean to say that homosexuality is a choice? He apologized for the maricon comment, but got defensive and apparently pissed that he wasn't being praised for his record. I guess if a presidential candidate calls someone a faggot, we're just supposed to get over it. I mean golly, it was on Imus. It was just guy talk. Whatever. The rest of his time was rambling and pissy. He was the least presidential of them all.
Then came the star of the show: Hillary. I've got to hand it to her, she was very presidential. She looks good, she sounds in control. Melissa Ethridge really pressed her with questions about former President Clinton's disappointing record on gay rights. I don't think Hillary recovered very well, but what can she say? The record is what it is.
I really didn't like Hillary's comments supporting states rights in the marriage debate. Does she really believe it's right for individual states to decide this important civil rights issue? Does she really believe its right for a state like Texas to affirmatively deny equality under the law for it's gay citizens while Massachusetts values all its citizens? I absolutely disagree with her on that and don't believe she understands this issue at all. I think she wants to find a way to avoid it.
Just what did Hillary mean by her opposition to "section 3 of DOMA?" The other candidates support full repeal of that reprehensible law. Is there part of DOMA she can live with? Nobody asked.
I also absolutely disagree with her lame defense of Don't Ask/Don't Tell as a step in the right direction at the time. I was in the Army when that mess was implemented and I could tell her that things got worse, not better for gay soldiers. DA/DT is, was, and always will be a bankrupt policy made into a bankrupt law.
So, on balance, I was not impressed with Hillary. I know
the gays love her, but this gay loves
Kucinich.