Remember when I said Lea Michele's sexy photoshoot in Marie Claire UK seemed wrong? I take it back. You get as sexy as you want, Lea. More power to you. It seems that Fox and certain conservative moms are upset with the Glee star's attempts at a more adult image, particularly her new Cosmo cover:
"Mom of two teenagers Suzette Valle, who writes a blog called Mamarazzi Knows Best, thinks Cosmo is just piggy-backing on GQ’s publicity from last year and she finds the cover shot of Michele contradictory.
“It’s irresponsible to be using an adult who represents a minor dressed in provocative clothes,” Valle told Fox411. “I think Cosmo is now taking advantage of the raucous GQ caused with their ‘Glee’ cover and hoping to cash in on the press that got.”
Here's the cover that's got Suzette's mommy jeans in a wad:
Naturally, a grocery store in Texas has removed the magazines from public view.
Lea Michele is a 24 year-old grown woman, but because she plays a teen, she can't wear a low-cut blouse, got that? Have these sainted moms ever actually watched Glee? Brittany, Santana, Quinn and Puck aren't exactly virginal Mouseketeers. Cosmo is a magazine for adults. It's not for children. What's wrong with that? Does everything have to be sanitized for a pre-schooler?
h/t Pass the Doucheys on the Right-Hand Side